Racial Policies in the US Admission System – Here’s What Is Actually Happening!
Education is one such sector that must be kept secluded from all social discrimination and differences. Education is the basic right of every child, and all children must have the scope to access it. For ages, the entire globe has been trying to work on this and make considerable changes in the education policy so that students across the globe get an equal chance at education.
In a country like the USA, racial discrimination is a severe issue, even within the education system and the policies. For years, the number of black children taking admission in schools and colleges in the USA was quite less in comparison to the overall numbers. Read info on Myassignmenthelp Blog
A few years back, only 15% of the total student enrolment in the USA represented black children. On the other hand, among the total number of students who were suspended, almost constituted 30 to 40% black students. This goes on to show the racial discrimination among the whites towards kids from black, brown and Asian families.
All of this has been possible because of the flawed educational policies adopted by the US government. Despite the protests and petitions, the outcome observed wasn’t something satisfying.
Once again, the USA Supreme Court faces the lash from the students and the audience regarding amending the educational policies regarding race consideration in the country’s educational policies.
This time the case concerns the policies of the two most reputed institutions in the USA – the University of North Carolina, a public school and Harvard University, a globally reputed university. The case moved to the Supreme Court because the lower courts dismissed the case on several grounds. They have repeatedly mentioned that these two universities have acted as per the precedents provided by the Supreme Court and since the lower courts freed them from all the chains of accusations against racial discrimination.
In light of these incidents, the Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) used this opportunity and demanded legal action against UNC and Harvard. They made sure to keep no stones unturned to fight against racial discrimination in the system and ensure that the education system gives equal learning opportunity to all students, irrespective of their skin colour.
Edward Blum is a renowned activist and is also the founder of the group working towards the same mission. Being a conservative activist, Blum brought similar legal actions against the University of Texas and the organised and significant voter rights act.
The SFFA maintained that the Constitution forbade the use of race in college admissions and sought to overturn past Supreme Court judgements that disagreed. It said colleges and universities can use other, race-neutral ways to build a diverse student body.
For example, the group gave the prospect of assessing a student’s socioeconomic position. Additionally, it recommended that universities discontinue giving candidates preference if their parents are alumni.
The interesting part of these court proceedings was that the justices took different sides in the entire dispute.
Justice Clarence Thomas has a record of opposition to the race consideration. He said, “I’ve heard the word ‘diversity’ quite a few times, and I don’t have a clue what it means.” On the other hand, very well-known activist Justice Samuel Alito compared “race consideration to giving minorities a starting point closer to the finish line.”
This came as very shocking to both the protestors and the activists. Some of them were present in the courtroom, which showed support for the protest, for example, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is also the court’s newest justice and its first female black member. She stated that UNC’S admission policies usually look at the candidates with all their characteristics, including their race. Supporting her statement, Justice Elena Kagan mentioned that universities build social leaders and thus suggested keeping race considerations away and giving minorities a chance to attend college.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar, who represents the Biden administration, mentioned that the schools’ admission policies support national security interests.
Wrapping it up
Racial consideration is a complicated subject to deal with when it comes to admission policies. The only thought behind all the protests and the chaos is that the USA is home to several people from different parts of the world, and the children have the right to education. And they should not be deprived of the same. Every protestor and the activist are trying their best to bring positive results regarding the same.
About the author
Amanda Gomes, an educator from Australia, is associated with MyAssignmenthelp.com. She is one of the most trusted and popular writers among all others. She believes that these services give online education opportunities a new horizon, which is beneficial for students.
